What Kind of Deal Would Have Landed Ian Kinsler?

Photo from Dallasnews.com

Kinsler?!  I hardly knew ‘er!   — Photo from Dallasnews.com

So it came out at one point yesterday during the State of the Franchise that Ian Kinsler might have been a Blue Jay – if he didn’t exercise his no-trade clause.  I didn’t hear about it when I was there, so it must have been an individual disclosure following the ‘official’ part of the program.

Some fans are reacting with relief, with the reassurances that AA is working to make this club better.  I’ve always assumed that’s a given.  All of this silence from the Jays front office has been infuriating from a fan’s perspective, but I can’t imagine for a minute that AA isn’t a busy man.

I’m more concerned with what kind of deal it would have taken to land Kinsler…  The radio show morning crew were convinced it was Bautista that would be on the move, given that it was Prince Fielder going in the other direction for the trade that was ultimately consummated.  I’m a bit skeptical of that.

Time to put my GM hat on.

Kinsler is not a player that can be ignored.  He’s a 3 time all-star, with a career slash line of .273/.349/.454, although he’s a few years removed from his seasons with an OPS over .800.  Last season he put together something along the lines of what I would expect Brett Lawrie being able to produce.  Anticipate an OPS between .725 and .775.  He’s also well above average defensively, which is a plus if he would have agreed to play on our slick astroturf (DARN).

Keep in the back of your head that a Brett Lawrie type player (albeit a 3x all-star Brett Lawrie player) was worth Shaun Marcum…

Bautista is the face of the Blue Jay’s Franchise.  He’s a monster when it comes to the long ball, and has had an OPS (well) above .850 for the past 4 of his all-star seasons.  He’s a plus defender with a ballistic missile for an arm.  His price point is also extremely reasonable, with his annual salary less than HALF of what Robinson Cano just got (and frankly, I’d prefer to have Joey Bats on my team).

I fail to connect how a straight up 1:1 trade would have made sense for the Blue Jays here.  Perhaps the Rangers would cough up an established starting pitcher as well?  Maybe an Alexi Ogando or Derek Holland?  Perhaps that’s wishful thinking. 2-3 prospects to help replenish the Jays farm system?  But the Rangers would need to surrender something else there to make that trade; The Jays would need to plug at least two holes for the cost of creating (a Bautista sized) one.

What would seem a bit more likely to me?  Adam Lind + a reliever.  Adam Lind plays like a MONSTER in the Rangers Ballpark in Arlington.  His slashline of .327/.361/.718 in 119 Plate Appearances was good for an OPS of 1.080, his highest of any ballpark with at least 100 AB’s.  There is certainly some question with his performance over one full year (is that kind of production sustainable…?), as well as his dismal performance against left handers (OPS is in the range of .603… OUCH.) which is why I would imagine Sergio Santos, Steve Delabar or Aaron Loup (*GASP*) would likely be going as well to sweeten the pot a bit.

Something that adds credence to the Lind + Reliever thought is that Prince Fielder, whom was eventually traded 1:1 for Kinsler, also plays 1B.  Perhaps the Rangers were looking for help at that position.

Salary would work out to be a wash in both deals presented above.

There is certainly reason to think that this deal would have improved both teams.  Rangers get their monster bat at first base (assuming Adam Lind can continue to produce at those inhuman levels in Arlington), plus a reliable bullpen arm to add to their already solid stable, and the Jays can plug the second base hole while getting bench flexibility to add a more suitable utility man, and clear some of the log jam in the bullpen.

The gears are certainly turning in the front office!  I’d be shocked if something weren’t done by the start of the season.

EDIT (31/01/2014):  I’m in the category of sports fan that interpreted this story as “Kinsler exercised his no-trade clause.”  In fact, this deal was ‘scuttled’ by the knowledge that Kinsler had Toronto on his no trade list, which could have happened at any point during the preliminary talks, or the deal could have been completely solidified.  We’ll never know.  Kind of a PR coup for the Jays though.  Also — it seems that it was Encarnacion, not Lind or Bautista.  Go figure.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: